What are two key purposes for the legitimate use of force by law enforcement?

The legitimate use of force by law enforcement is justified primarily for two critical purposes: achieving control and defending oneself or others. When law enforcement officers encounter situations that escalate to a level where verbal commands or mere presence are insufficient, they may need to apply force to gain control of the situation. This could involve subduing a violent suspect or managing a chaotic environment to ensure the safety of all involved.

Moreover, defense is a fundamental principle underlying the use of force. Officers have the responsibility to protect themselves and others from imminent harm. In situations where there is a clear and immediate threat of injury or death, law enforcement may resort to force to neutralize that threat. This dual purpose of control and defense is essential for upholding public safety and ensuring that officers can operate effectively in high-stress scenarios.

Other options, while they touch on aspects of policing, do not encapsulate the primary justifications for using force in a direct sense. For instance, mere communication or detention lacks the urgency that often necessitates the use of force. Gathering evidence and controlling a scene, while crucial to law enforcement, do not inherently involve physical force. Similarly, maintaining public relations and enforcing laws are important functions of law enforcement but are more about proactive policing rather than the reactive necessity